Tuesday, August 31, 2004

Holy backpedaling Batman

Bush is at it again. That indecisive S.O.B. said yesterday that a victory in the war on terror may not be possible. Today he says we will win. Which is it you slack-jawed jackass? I can only assume that this sort of hijinks will keep on occuring throughout the week during the Republican National Convention. Why even have it? I think they know who they are going to nominate...

Read the story here or below...

Bush reverses course, says we'll win terror war
Associated Press
August 31, 2004


NASHVILLE, Tenn. -- President Bush said Tuesday ``we will win'' the war on terror, seeking to quell controversy and Democratic criticism over his earlier remark that victory may not be possible.

In a speech to the national convention of the American Legion, Bush said, ``We meet today in a time of war for our country, a war we did not start yet one that we will win.

That statement differed from Bush's earlier comment, aired Monday in a pre-taped television interview, that ``I don't think you can win'' the war on terror. That had Democrats running for the cameras to criticize Bush for being defeatist and flip-flopping from previous predictions of victory.

``What if President Reagan had said that it may be difficult to win the war against communism? What if other presidents had said it'd be difficult to win the war - the Cold War?'' Democratic vice presidential candidate John Edwards said on ABC's ``Nightline'' program. ``The war on terrorism is absolutely winnable.''

Bush's comment - and the ensuing criticism - took attention away from the carefully crafted image of Bush being broadcast from the Republican National Convention in New York, as a decisive wartime commander in chief who is securing America's safety and sure of the course on which he has set the nation.

As Bush continued a pre-convention journey through one closely contested state after another, aides scrambled to clarify the president's remark and contain the story. And in Tuesday's speech before the American Legion, with popular Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona by his side, Bush himself sought to hit back.

``In this different kind of war, we may never sit down at a peace table,'' Bush said. ``But make no mistake about it, we are winning and we will win.''

Bush also defended his decision to remove Saddam Hussein from power. Though no weapons of mass destruction have been found, he said Saddam had the capability to make them.

``Knowing what I know today I would have taken the same action,'' he said. ``America and the world are safer with Saddam Hussein sitting in a prison cell.''

Bush's war on terror remark was the latest in a string of recent comments in which the president seemed to backpedal previous certainties.

In a flurry of interviews timed to coincide with this week's convention, Bush acknowledged a ``miscalculation'' about what the United States would encounter in postwar Iraq after the fall of Saddam Hussein's regime and said the ``catastrophic success'' of a swift military victory there helped produce the still-potent insurgency.
``First George W. Bush said he miscalculated the war in Iraq, then he called it a catastrophic success and blamed the military,'' Kerry spokeswoman Allison Dobson said. ``Now he says we can't win the war on terror. Is that what (chief Bush political strategist) Karl Rove means when he calls for steady leadership?''

The campaign professed not to be worried that the president had gone off-message.

``The American people have watched the president lead the war on terror decisively for three years,'' Bush-Cheney spokesman Steve Schmidt said. ``The people of this country know what his leadership is.''

But Bill Carrick, a California-based Democratic consultant, said the comments - even if they were merely unfortunately phrased expressions of mostly obvious truths - are politically dangerous because they speak to the very heart of the president's re-election pitch.

Carrick saw no hypocrisy in Democrats playing the issue, even though they have cried foul over similar attacks on Democratic presidential challenger John Kerry. For instance, Vice President Dick Cheney criticized Kerry for saying he could fight ``a more effective, more thoughtful, more strategic, more proactive, more sensitive war on terror'' by singling out for mockery his use of the word ``sensitive.''
``Turnabout is fair play on this,'' Carrick said. ``Exploit this to the hilt.''

Bush's campaign swing will land him in New York on Wednesday, a day before his convention speech accepting the GOP nomination for a second term. From Nashville, Bush travels to Alleman, Iowa, to attend a farm show and ends the long day of campaigning in another crucial state, Pennsylvania, where he makes a late-evening appearance at a picnic.

Also Tuesday, Bush said on NBC's ``Today'' show that he will continue pursuing diplomatic rather than military options to try to get Iran to halt its nuclear program. Earlier this month, Iran confirmed it had resumed building nuclear centrifuges, which can be used to enrich uranium to weapons grade, and declared it should have the right to advanced nuclear technology.

While he's ``deeply concerned'' by Iran's actions, Bush said diplomatic efforts are just beginning there and he's hopeful they will be successful.


dwhilton said...

arg what does he mean "by a war we did not start?" thats bullshit i could have sworn just a year ago (was it a year ago?) he went on national television and said "Saddam you have 24hrs(?) to admit(or something to that exstent)that u have chemical weapons" ok maybe not that but u know and im pretty sure everyone else knows that yeah we pretty much started the war. crap i might have made a huge mistake posting this comment of well send the hate mail to dwhilton.blogspot.com nice page btw

Brian said...

First off, thanks for the comment, I was beginning to wonder if anyone actually read my meandering thoughts and my copy and paste posts when I am short on time.

I hope you keep coming back as this baby of mine osn't even a year old.

As for the real meat of the comment, I honestly didn't read the entire story. It's typical AP story writing. Having worked at a newspaper for six years, the editors rarely read the AP copy to check anything. Although this appears to be a quote by the President, that then changes things.

As my one paragraph written at the beginning states, he is the master of backpedaling. Even though he may be just referring to the war on terror in general, it's hard to say when the man who is apparently in charge of the country is obviously not the most intelligent or well-spoken man.